McGirt v. Oklahoma: What the Supreme Court’s Native American treaty rights decision is and is not

Banner headlines in The Washington Post (“Half the land in Oklahoma could be returned to Native Americans. It should be.”) and elsewhere are wrong. McGirt has nothing to do with land ownership. Rather …Banner headlines in The Washington Post (“Half the land in Oklahoma could be returned to Native Americans. It should be.”) and elsewhere are wrong. McGirt has nothing to do with land ownership. Rather …